Ecology III
Geographical
distribution
The Central European sites where Sarcoscypha
fruits concentrate on areas with rather high precipitation and altitude, plenty
of melting water available in early spring, and a predominantly more basic soil
(but Pidlich-Aigner 1999: 15 found Sacroscypha
also on silicous soils). Especially in the
large area of, e.g., the alps or the scands the genus Sarcoscypha
appears to occur widespread. Nevertheless the inhabited single biotops are
often rather small, since the ecological prerequisites are only fulfilled in
the so-called extrazonal (`island´) vegetation, usually narrow biotops along
small rivulets or large streams, but also shady valleys and north-exposed
slopes without running surface water. Rich Sarcoscypha
sites may occupy many hundreds of apothecia while poor sites only a few. In the
more north European lowlands Sarcoscypha
is restricted to often small forest islands not used by agriculture. That Sarcoscypha originally had a much denser
occurrence in the northern lowlands is suggested by the rapid invasion of S. austriaca and S. coccinea into the recently drained and forested Netherlands
polders as reported by van Duuren & van Duuren (2003, 2004). The
extraordinary frequent occurrence in the monoculture forests on these polders
is probably due to the highly calcareous soil which constitutes the previous
seabed of that area.
Distribution of Sarcoscypha in
Differences among the
three (or four) European species
Species of Sarcoscypha clearly differ in
in their ecological amplitude. S.
coccinea prefers more thermophilous habitats favouring planar to colline
areas, while S. jurana and especially
S. austriaca prefer montaneous to
subalpine-boreal habitats.
S. austriaca: montaneous to subalpine-boreal, very abundant on basic soils of higher
mountains (Alps, Pyrenees,
S. jurana: montaneous areas with very
calcareous or basic soils: Jura Mts. (malm, French, Swiss & German), small
isolated volcanic spots like Hegau (SW of Baden-Württemberg) and Vogelsberg
(Hessen), Muschelkalk (Luxembourg), scattered sites in E- and SE- (Dinarian
alps) and SW-Europe (Spanish Pyrenees).
S. coccinea: planar to colline, prefering
basic soils, atlantic and subatlantic, sub- and eumediterranean, and pannonic
areas, becoming very rare in Great Britain-Ireland, Scandinavia, and NE-Europe.
S. macaronesica: with certainty only found in the laural forests of the Macaronesian
islands: Tenerife (Anaga, Teno), Gomera, La Palma (Los Tilos), and Madeira.
Collections from the eumediterranean belt and the atlantic coast identified as S.
macaronesica are perhaps not sufficiently different in their micromorphology from southern populations of S.
coccinea, but published detailed,
also molecular studies are wanting.
Threatening
A recent study (Butterfill & Spooner, 1995)
showed that the relative abundance of the two recognized British species, S.
austriaca and S. coccinea, has significantly changed in recent
years. The once common S. coccinea
appears in the past 25 years to have become much rarer, while S. austriaca
became distinctly more common when comparing recent with earlier collections.
Likewise, in
In areas remote from the
alps the sites are often rather disjunct. At such places the fungus is possibly
threatened especially through human influence that injures or alters the
natural vegetation, but perhaps also through an extract of fruit-bodies. All species of Sarcoscypha are classified as red
list fungi and should be protected.
Large areas appear to be free of
fructifications, or perhaps Sarcoscypha appears there only in very
favourable years. For example, within the areas of Oesling (
Sympatric growth
Usually
a given site is only inhabited by one species of Sarcoscypha (allopatric
growth). However, quite many places are known where the areas of two or even
three of the species touch and overlap. Here, sometimes two species could be
detected growing at the same site. In such cases the inhabited branches of the
two belonged to different tree genera. Only once S. coccinea and S.
austriaca was found to grow at one site on the same host genus (Corylus),
but on different branches (Pidlich-Aigner 1999: 15).
Mapping,
collaboration
The
project tries to collect data from whole
All
kinds of data are welcome, but essentially the following:
- GPS coordinates (l/w degree, minutes, seconds), or alternatively for
- Altitude above sea level
- Substrate if recognized, trees and plants growing around
- Date of collection, name collector
- Site name and village, next town, preferably with indicating the
direction (e.g., 12 km NW of …)
Collectors
who have made more than a few collections may send their data also in a data
matrix, preferably in Excel.
If you
wish you may add to your collection data drawings or micrographs of the
ascospores or other characters, e.g., as attach to your mail, especially if you
are uncertain about their identity. I am also happy about fresh material,
preferably concerning S. macaronesica and mediterranean or extraeuropean
collections, but also to clarify uncertain European finds. Please add a small
piece of the branch (including wood) for anatomical identification of the host
genus. Since Sarcoscypha is only a
rather small of my many projects, and because of the difficulty to identify
herbarium material, please contact me before sending fungal
specimens!